( Being Text of Press Conference By Southern Leaders Forum(SLF) onAugust 23,2017 @Lagos)
The Southern Leaders Forum (SLF) welcomes President Muhammadu Buhari
back to the country after 105 days medical vacation in the United
Kingdom.It is our fervent prayer that God Almighty will perfect his
health so he can effectively discharge the functions of his office as
the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
We have studied the national broadcast by Mr President on Monday
21August,2017;and after a careful and thorough analysis of the speech,we
make the following observations.
1 The President expressed his disaffection about comments on Nigeria
while he was away that “question our collective existence as a nation”
and which he said have crossed the “red lines”.
Against the background of the threat to treat “hate speech” as
“terrorism”, we see a veiled threat to bare fangs and commence the
criminalization of dissenting opinions in our national discourse ..
Experience worldwide has shown that any attempt to deal with dissent
by force usually drives it underground which makes it much more
dangerous and difficult to deal with.
We should have learnt a lesson or two from Boko Haram which was an
open organization before the state drove it underground and we are still
under its reign of terror despite official claim that it has been
“technically defeated” or “degraded ”
As elders who believe that it is better to seek solutions to
problems, we appeal that we must engage in social engineering fully
aware that globalization has made it very difficult to use repressive
tactics to repress opinions.
2 Mr President deploys the imagery of the late Chief Emeka Ojukwu to
play down the the demand for the renegotiation of the structure of
Nigeria by saying they both agreed in Daura in 2003 that we must remain
“one and united”.
While we agree with them,the meeting between the two of them could
not have been a Sovereign National Conference whose decisions cannot be
reviewed .The fact that we agree on their conclusion that we should
remain united does not foreclose discussions of the terms and
conditions of the Union.
The claim that Nigeria’s “unity is settled and not negotiable” is
untenable.. Every country is a daily dialogue and there is nothing
finally settled in its life.
Stable nations are still fine-tuning details of the architecture of
their existence now and then. How much more Nigeria that has yet to
attain nationhood ?
If If we were a settled nation ,we would not be dealing with the many
crises of nation building that are afflicting us today which have made
it extremely difficult to squarely and urgently face issues of growth
and development.
The British negotiated to put the various ethnic groups together.All
the constitutional conferences held in the years before independence
were negotiations .
When the North walked out of the parliament in 1953 after Chief
Anthony Enahoro moved the motion for independence it took negotiations
to bring them back into the union after their eight-point agenda which
was mainly about confederation All the conferences held after
independence on constitutionalism are all forms of negotiations .There
is no peaceful co-existence that is not about negotiations in a plural
society.
3 The one sentence by the President that every Nigerian can live
anywhere without let or hindrance if meant to address the quit notice by
Arewa youths against Igbos is rather too short to address the clear and
present danger that the unwarranted threat represents.
We are distressed by the refusal of the police to comply with the
arrest orders given by the Kaduna State Governor and the Vice-President
while the President was away.Instead of ensuring that these orders are
carried out ,the President has now come to just make a bland comment on
the explosive issue.We are of the view that leadership requires more
than this at this crucial moment.
4 We acknowledge the President’s admission that there are ”
legitimate concerns”in the land .That is commendable .We however
disagree with his take that Nigeria is a “federation”.Nigeria ceased to
be a federation since 1966 after the first coup.The turning of Nigeria
into a unitary constitution which is not conducive for peace and
development in a multi-ethnic country is what the military-imposed 1999
Constitution ,which lied against itself with the “We the people”, is
all about.This is the taproot of the crisis of nationhood in Nigeria.
5 We do not accept the President’s claim that the National Assembly
and the Council of State”are the only legitimate the appropriate
bodies for national discourse”. While we do not dispute that these are
legal bodies,we insist they are not appropriate bodies to discuss the
social contract that could bind us together as a nation-state.While the
composition of the National Assembly is clearly jigged and indeed one
of the bodies to be restructured ,the Council of State is not open to
Nigerians for any discourse.
If any “discourse ” is to take place on constitutional changes within
the democratic framework Mr President is the one who has the
responsibility to initiate the appropriate process .
6 We are equally miffed that the President talks about the serial
onslaughts by AK-47 wielding Fulani herdsmen against defenseless
farmers as a conflict between two quarreling groups.In the last 2 years,
the Fulani herdsmen have become much more ferocious in their attacks
against farmers in the South and Middle Belt areas of the country with
security forces shying away from enforcing law and order.
To present the various onslaughts on farmers by these herdsmen as
“two -fighting ” would portray the President as taking sides with the
aggressive Miyetti Allah .
While we do not hold the Administration responsible for all the
causes of agitations in Nigeria due to the crises of unitary
constitution, there are clearly many errors of commission and omission
the government has committed that have accentuated the strong
self-determination feelings and agitations across the country which
only restructuring can tame today:
1 The insensitive and clearly lopsided recruitments /appointments
into all federal institutions .Even key prominent northern leaders have
expressed openly their disapproval of the pattern of appointments.
2 Concentration of most of the heads of Armed Forces and other National Security Agencies in a section of the country
3 The President going on a global stage to say he could not treat
those who gave him 5% of their votes equally with those who supported
him with 97%
4 Official indifference to the murderous activities of herdsmen
against peace -loving citizens on their farms and other settlements .
5 The flagrant breach of the constitutionally enshrined Federal Character principle.
6 Appointment of Legal Adviser of Meyiti Allah as Secretary of the Federal Character Commission.
7 The early retirement of mostly southern senior officers from the Nigerian Armed forces and other security forces.
CONCLUSION
As elders who who have spent most of our lives fighting for the unity of
the country based on justice, fairness and equity, we call on the
President to realize that the country is in a very bad shape at the
moment and requires statesmanship and not ethnic, religious ,regional
and political partisanships.
This is the time to renegotiate Nigeria along federal lines
negotiated by our founding fathers to stem the tide of separatist
feelings and agitations.
This is why we do not accept that it portrays the President in a
favorable light to be away for a long time and to return to a badly
fractured polity and avoid promoting in a new dialogue for a better
,just ,inclusive and peaceful country. |
0 comments: